v1.5 Master Template Sample — Generated from institutional bank QA package (VAC-QA-42-v1.5). Illustrative / simulated fields for demo only. Client reports are never shared.
Client Audit TemplateReview And Reputation Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 1 / 4
Client Facing · Horizontal Audit Sheet

Review And Reputation Audit

Audit of review count, rating, velocity, recency, response quality, sentiment themes, and competitor review gap.

Reputation risk reviewVelocity, recency, response quality, and rating signals analyzed.
VelocityRecent review acquisition trend.
Response QualityOwner engagement signal strength.
Risk StripReputation drag isolated.
REVIEWSRATINGRECENCYRESPONSE
Client
Joe's Pizza Brooklyn

Business being evaluated.

Market
[SIM:market]

Local search market and service area.

Category
[SIM:business_category]

Primary category used for comparison.

Audit Date
2026-07-08

Timestamp for all findings.

Data Confidence
[SIM:confidence_score]/100

Reliability based on evidence coverage.

Risk Level
[SIM:risk_level]

Operating risk from current visibility gaps.

Primary Gap
[SIM:primary_visibility_gap]

Largest constraint detected.

Next Action
[SIM:recommended_next_action]

Highest-impact action from this template.

Automation note: This template is designed to populate from structured audit data. Empty sections should be hidden by the report renderer when source confidence is below the configured threshold.
Client Audit TemplateReview And Reputation Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 2 / 4
Score Model

Review And Reputation Audit · Diagnostic Breakdown

Connects review performance to search trust, map-pack competitiveness, and conversion confidence.

Score Components

Review Count[SIM:review_count_score]/100
Rating Strength[SIM:rating_strength_score]/100
Review Velocity[SIM:review_velocity_score]/100
Response Coverage[SIM:response_coverage_score]/100
Sentiment Quality[SIM:sentiment_quality_score]/100
Competitor Gap[SIM:competitor_gap_score]/100
Plain-English meaning: [SIM:plain_english_summary]
Business risk: [SIM:business_risk_summary]

Decision Panel

Fastest Win
[SIM:fastest_win]

Lowest-friction improvement.

Highest Risk
[SIM:highest_risk]

Most damaging active gap.

Revenue Link
[SIM:highest_revenue_link]

Commercial linkage.

Confidence
[SIM:confidence_band]

Evidence quality.

Top Findings

1
Review count gap

Market leaders have significantly more public proof than the client.

Critical
2
Review velocity slow

Recent review acquisition is not strong enough to compound trust.

Fix
3
Owner responses inconsistent

Responses are missing, generic, or delayed.

Fix
4
Sentiment themes unclear

The report should identify what customers repeatedly value or criticize.

QA
Client Audit TemplateReview And Reputation Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 3 / 4
Evidence Layer

Evidence, Screenshots, And Competitor Context

Every generated claim should trace back to a source, timestamp, screenshot, scan result, or manual reviewer note.

Evidence Receipt Log

SourceQuery / URL / PromptFindingChecked
[SIM:evidence_source_1][SIM:evidence_query_1][SIM:evidence_finding_1][SIM:evidence_checked_at_1]
[SIM:evidence_source_2][SIM:evidence_query_2][SIM:evidence_finding_2][SIM:evidence_checked_at_2]
[SIM:evidence_source_3][SIM:evidence_query_3][SIM:evidence_finding_3][SIM:evidence_checked_at_3]
[SIM:evidence_source_4][SIM:evidence_query_4][SIM:evidence_finding_4][SIM:evidence_checked_at_4]
[SIM:evidence_source_5][SIM:evidence_query_5][SIM:evidence_finding_5][SIM:evidence_checked_at_5]
[SIM:evidence_source_6][SIM:evidence_query_6][SIM:evidence_finding_6][SIM:evidence_checked_at_6]

Competitor Delta

CompetitorScoreAdvantageGap To Close
Bleecker Street Pizza[SIM:competitor_1_score][SIM:competitor_1_advantage][SIM:competitor_1_gap_to_close]
John's of Bleecker Street[SIM:competitor_2_score][SIM:competitor_2_advantage][SIM:competitor_2_gap_to_close]
Prince Street Pizza[SIM:competitor_3_score][SIM:competitor_3_advantage][SIM:competitor_3_gap_to_close]
[SIM:competitor_4_name][SIM:competitor_4_score][SIM:competitor_4_advantage][SIM:competitor_4_gap_to_close]
[SIM:competitor_screenshot_or_map_pack_image]
Client Audit TemplateReview And Reputation Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 4 / 4
Action Output

Priority Fix Matrix And 30-Day Audit Roadmap

This page converts the audit finding into a specific execution sequence the client can understand and the internal system can track.

Priority Fix Matrix

PriorityIssueImpactEffortRecommended Fix
P1[SIM:priority_1_issue][SIM:priority_1_impact][SIM:priority_1_effort][SIM:priority_1_recommended_fix]
P2[SIM:priority_2_issue][SIM:priority_2_impact][SIM:priority_2_effort][SIM:priority_2_recommended_fix]
P3[SIM:priority_3_issue][SIM:priority_3_impact][SIM:priority_3_effort][SIM:priority_3_recommended_fix]
P4[SIM:priority_4_issue][SIM:priority_4_impact][SIM:priority_4_effort][SIM:priority_4_recommended_fix]
P5[SIM:priority_5_issue][SIM:priority_5_impact][SIM:priority_5_effort][SIM:priority_5_recommended_fix]
P6[SIM:priority_6_issue][SIM:priority_6_impact][SIM:priority_6_effort][SIM:priority_6_recommended_fix]
Days 1–7
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_1]
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_2]
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_3]
Days 8–14
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_1]
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_2]
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_3]
Days 15–30
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_1]
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_2]
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_3]

Conditional Notes

  • [SIM:conditional_note_1]
  • [SIM:conditional_note_2]
  • [SIM:conditional_note_3]

Final Audit Recommendation

[SIM:final_recommendation_summary]

[SIM:client_facing_next_step]