v1.5 Master Template Sample — Generated from institutional bank QA package (VAC-QA-42-v1.5). Illustrative / simulated fields for demo only. Client reports are never shared.
Client Audit TemplateAI Search Visibility Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 1 / 4
Client Facing · Horizontal Audit Sheet

AI Search Visibility Audit

Tests whether the business appears in AI-style local recommendations and whether entity signals support confident AI retrieval.

AI search/entity reviewAI answer inclusion, entity recognition, and source authority evidence.
Answer VisibilityPresence in AI-style responses.
Entity RecognitionBusiness/category relationship clarity.
Source InclusionCitation and authority signals.
AI SEARCHENTITYSOURCESIGNAL
Client
Joe's Pizza Brooklyn

Business being evaluated.

Market
[SIM:market]

Local search market and service area.

Category
[SIM:business_category]

Primary category used for comparison.

Audit Date
2026-07-08

Timestamp for all findings.

Data Confidence
[SIM:confidence_score]/100

Reliability based on evidence coverage.

Risk Level
[SIM:risk_level]

Operating risk from current visibility gaps.

Primary Gap
[SIM:primary_visibility_gap]

Largest constraint detected.

Next Action
[SIM:recommended_next_action]

Highest-impact action from this template.

Automation note: This template is designed to populate from structured audit data. Empty sections should be hidden by the report renderer when source confidence is below the configured threshold.
Client Audit TemplateAI Search Visibility Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 2 / 4
Score Model

AI Search Visibility Audit · Diagnostic Breakdown

Designed for prompts across ChatGPT-style, Gemini-style, Perplexity-style, and map/search recommendation behavior.

Score Components

AI Mention Strength[SIM:ai_mention_strength_score]/100
Entity Clarity[SIM:entity_clarity_score]/100
Source Support[SIM:source_support_score]/100
Review Proof[SIM:review_proof_score]/100
Website Authority[SIM:website_authority_score]/100
Competitor Mentions[SIM:competitor_mentions_score]/100
Plain-English meaning: [SIM:plain_english_summary]
Business risk: [SIM:business_risk_summary]

Decision Panel

Fastest Win
[SIM:fastest_win]

Lowest-friction improvement.

Highest Risk
[SIM:highest_risk]

Most damaging active gap.

Revenue Link
[SIM:highest_revenue_link]

Commercial linkage.

Confidence
[SIM:confidence_band]

Evidence quality.

Top Findings

1
AI mention weakness

The business is not consistently surfaced in local recommendation prompts.

High Risk
2
Entity signals fragmented

Website, GBP, citations, and reviews may not reinforce the same identity.

Fix
3
Source support thin

AI systems need corroborating public sources to recommend confidently.

Fix
4
Competitors appear first

Other businesses may be more frequently recommended by AI outputs.

Watch
Client Audit TemplateAI Search Visibility Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 3 / 4
Evidence Layer

Evidence, Screenshots, And Competitor Context

Every generated claim should trace back to a source, timestamp, screenshot, scan result, or manual reviewer note.

Evidence Receipt Log

SourceQuery / URL / PromptFindingChecked
[SIM:evidence_source_1][SIM:evidence_query_1][SIM:evidence_finding_1][SIM:evidence_checked_at_1]
[SIM:evidence_source_2][SIM:evidence_query_2][SIM:evidence_finding_2][SIM:evidence_checked_at_2]
[SIM:evidence_source_3][SIM:evidence_query_3][SIM:evidence_finding_3][SIM:evidence_checked_at_3]
[SIM:evidence_source_4][SIM:evidence_query_4][SIM:evidence_finding_4][SIM:evidence_checked_at_4]
[SIM:evidence_source_5][SIM:evidence_query_5][SIM:evidence_finding_5][SIM:evidence_checked_at_5]
[SIM:evidence_source_6][SIM:evidence_query_6][SIM:evidence_finding_6][SIM:evidence_checked_at_6]

Competitor Delta

CompetitorScoreAdvantageGap To Close
Bleecker Street Pizza[SIM:competitor_1_score][SIM:competitor_1_advantage][SIM:competitor_1_gap_to_close]
John's of Bleecker Street[SIM:competitor_2_score][SIM:competitor_2_advantage][SIM:competitor_2_gap_to_close]
Prince Street Pizza[SIM:competitor_3_score][SIM:competitor_3_advantage][SIM:competitor_3_gap_to_close]
[SIM:competitor_4_name][SIM:competitor_4_score][SIM:competitor_4_advantage][SIM:competitor_4_gap_to_close]
[SIM:competitor_screenshot_or_map_pack_image]
Client Audit TemplateAI Search Visibility Audit
Audit ID: [SIM:audit_id] · Page 4 / 4
Action Output

Priority Fix Matrix And 30-Day Audit Roadmap

This page converts the audit finding into a specific execution sequence the client can understand and the internal system can track.

Priority Fix Matrix

PriorityIssueImpactEffortRecommended Fix
P1[SIM:priority_1_issue][SIM:priority_1_impact][SIM:priority_1_effort][SIM:priority_1_recommended_fix]
P2[SIM:priority_2_issue][SIM:priority_2_impact][SIM:priority_2_effort][SIM:priority_2_recommended_fix]
P3[SIM:priority_3_issue][SIM:priority_3_impact][SIM:priority_3_effort][SIM:priority_3_recommended_fix]
P4[SIM:priority_4_issue][SIM:priority_4_impact][SIM:priority_4_effort][SIM:priority_4_recommended_fix]
P5[SIM:priority_5_issue][SIM:priority_5_impact][SIM:priority_5_effort][SIM:priority_5_recommended_fix]
P6[SIM:priority_6_issue][SIM:priority_6_impact][SIM:priority_6_effort][SIM:priority_6_recommended_fix]
Days 1–7
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_1]
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_2]
  • [SIM:first_7_days_task_3]
Days 8–14
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_1]
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_2]
  • [SIM:days_8_14_task_3]
Days 15–30
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_1]
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_2]
  • [SIM:days_15_30_task_3]

Conditional Notes

  • [SIM:conditional_note_1]
  • [SIM:conditional_note_2]
  • [SIM:conditional_note_3]

Final Audit Recommendation

[SIM:final_recommendation_summary]

[SIM:client_facing_next_step]